I am very much enjoying the new HBO series A Game Of Thrones. After a workmanlike prologue of a pilot where all of our players were lovingly introduced and given mini-character workouts to demonstrate their calibration, tonight we were treated to a simmering second episode filled with foreboding skirmishes.
It’s so awesome that I am actually watching an HBO series as it airs for the first time since The Wire.
I have not read the books, mostly because I’m functionally illiterate.
But something very trivial crossed my mind during the second episode that I wanted to get an opinion on: Boobs. And the absence of wiener.
Without going into much SPOILER territory. There is a plot line in the second episode where reluctant bride Daenerys Targaryen (who’d previously had her maidenhood traded like so many horses to a warrior tribe leader by her sneering brother) becomes more acclimated to her situation and decides to take action.
To the carnal delight of many viewers this transformation comes by way of a new friendship with a former child whore who teaches her “how to Dougie” so she can best learn “how to train her husband’s dragon.” We see plenty of the gorgeous Emilia Clarke’s chest and, through angled shooting and careful blocking, none of her barbarian mate’s dong.
This is not a plea to see boners. Although it sure is starting to read like it. I don’t think it would have necessarily added anything to the story, although his junk could be argued is the mini-boss which needs to be defeated by episode’s end.
However, compare this decision to another period epic series that reveled in nudity; Starz’ “Spartacus: Blood & Sand” which required Lucy Lawless to get fitted with a merken and gave lady fans (alongside, no doubt, a hearty contingent of gentlemen) a display of enough sausage to rival Oktoberfest. And it’s not like HBO has a policy against rods, any fan of The Wire got several visual clues of when Omar was coming. Or rather, had just got done with it.
Maybe because gender politics have already been stapled on to GoT by the New York Times review (summarized: girls like vampires, boys like swords and nary the twain shall meet) but I am curious if anyone, specifically women and gay men, found the decision to cut the junk whilst jigging the boobs relevant.
My guess is that seeing a dong on screen comparatively moves the needles much less for women than bare breasts do for men. Also, female viewers are less likely to blanche at a pair of boobs where some male viewers might react negatively to a strange dork swinging on their HD LCD screen.
But, in the spirit of gender equality, I wanted to ask anyone reading this.
Also: Happy Easter.